Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Saddam Hussein's Trial

I was wondering... what are people's thoughts on Saddam Hussein's trial?

I've been reading the news about his recent cross-examination and I'm of mixed opinion on the overall trial. The first charges laid against him accused him of putting 148 people to death, and countless others through torture, as part of a repraisal in Dujail against what was perceived as an attempt on his life. Subsequent charges have recently been laid accusing Saddam of attempting genocide against the Kurds.

Although everything seems to point to there being substantial evidence that Saddam Hussein did indeed commit these acts and was indeed a tyrannical and murderous President... the man does have a point when he accuses the court trying him of being "illegitimate". What exactly is "an international court of justice" anyway? Perhaps some law students would like to comment? I mean Saddam (and also his co-accused) faces death by hanging as a maximum penalty... and given that I am against the death penalty and believe it to be a violation of human rights in itself, how is this international court upholding human rights? Is it possible to use this court as a poilitical tool? Is the world ready for a non-state-affiliated international court of justice or is the world still too preoccupied with state sovereignty as being the only legitimate form of power.

Now I know most of the people who read my blog don't comment (because y'all tell me!) but I really hope people do because then I will... feel less lonely... and because I'm interested to hear what you think!

Alex